Influence of Twitter and Social Media in UK Elections

Influence of Twitter and Social Media in UK choicesRole and Influence of Twitter and other complaisant media platforms during re cent UK options initiationOver the years, affectionate media platforms have rapidly grown asa sphere for semipolitical activism due to its wide byreach. Sharing ofinformation and intelligence operation program obtainable across the societal media networking sites invarious ways is now turning into a vital strategy for the political leaders andparties to campaign (Thorsen, capital of Mississippi and Lilleker, 2017). policy-makingleaders across the world have begun using Twitter, Facebook and other affablenetworking sites as a medium for political communication and trade during option campaigns. The political parties try to increase the reach of theirelection campaign by channelling their message through the upstart audiencespersonal networks (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017). The leaders are ableto come along support either through direct interaction with the individuals orthrough messages that are everyplacelap within their connected social circle (Bright et al., 2017) This study dialogue virtu in ally the extent to which Twitter and othersocial media networking sites played a decisive role in the recently held twoelections in United terra firma in relatively quick succession in 2015 and 2017. Itwill also assess how much did these platforms influence the political partiesstrategy during the campaigning. Twitter and 2015 UK commonplace optionThe social media has been a part of the Britains electoralscenario for a composition since the 2015 popular elections. With Twitter world awell-established social media tool in UK, Segesten and Bossetta (2017) nonesthat the UK became the blurb largest country after United States following theBritish Twittersphere having an estimated 14.8 jillion news reports in 2015. The 2015 general elections which was influenced by the social media for the first time saw Twitter being dominated by left-wing Labour troupe with 58,000 intakes of suffragelabour as compared to centre-right Conservatives 25,000 uses of voter turnoutconservative (Bartlett and Jones, 2015). Other parties including UK Independent comp either had 15,000 mentions with voteukip and 27,000 votesnp for SNP (Bartlett and Jones, 2015)Margetts (2017) highlights that while the electoral successof the Conservatives was attributed to the giant expenditure of 1.2 million onthe negative Facebook advertising targeted at Labour candidate Ed Miliband, itwas the Labours bottom-up campaign on Twitter which drew the perplexity ofthe users. The Twitter campaign accounts of all the 8 political partiesand leaders had produced a total of 22,397 tweets throughout the elections(Jensen, 2016) but of those about 13% of tweets were informative whilegenerating wholly 2 % of mobilizing content (Segesten and Bossetta, 2017). levelthough the Labour and Conservatives tried to drive voter engagement, themobi lizing messages by them lacked as against the UK Independent Party (UKIP)and Scottish National Party (SNP), who tweeted deem of multiplication a day targetingspecific constituencies (Segesten and Bossetta, 2017)As (Lewis, 2015) notes that most of thepoliticians and their troupe utilize the social media platform as a digitalmarketing tool without interacting with the voters personally. Even the contentposted on Twitter and Facebook appeared to prove the loyalty of the partyrather than drawing the attention of the new potential voters. 2017 UK General Election The first-social media election The GE 2015 had the potential to be the first social mediaelection (Reuters, 2015) but the 2017 UK general elections was dubbed as thefirst social media election in the country. The GE 2017 which was announced asa snap election by Prime Minister Theresa may ahead of the 2020 date in orderto discover Brexit a success (Boyle and Maidment, 2017) saw social media platformsspecially Twitter turnin g into a political battleground for the politicalparties while attracting many first-time unseasoned voters (Thorsen, Jackson andLilleker, 2017). The number of Twitter users in 2017 rose to 16.4 million from 14.8 million in 2015 within the election check (Bright et al., 2017 cited Statista, 2017). The social media became the dominant source of political news and information (Gallacher and Kaminska, 2017) more than the traditional media which influenced both the political candidates and commonplaces opinions throughout the election. Labour was yet again the most active political party onsocial media to strategically plan and use their social media presenceinnovatively on a larger scale as compared to Conservatives. The party beganits online campaigning scour before the elections began to appeal and target theyoung voters while investing in a bulky effort in using Twitter and Facebook toencourage them to put down their vote (Booth and Hern, 2017). Polonski (2017) notes that even though the Labour lagged inthe election polls throughout the campaigning, it won the battle for votes onsocial media election by gaining the highest number of votes as against theConservatives (Booth and Hern, 2017).The impact of Crosbyn and Labour partys active engagementwith the voters direct to 622,000 people (GetSet, 2017) supporting the party inthe final 24 hours of the accommodation period alone. Jeremy Corbyn himself tweeted on his personal Twitteraccount on a regular basis as a result of which 26% of his posts urged thepublic to vote for the party (MarketMakers, 2017). During the entire campaign as Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker(2017) note, Labour garnered over 1 million shares on Facebook, which was threetimes more than the Conservatives likewise circular over three times as often. While the Conservatives spent over 1 million on negativeFacebook adverts assail Labour candidate Jeremy Corbyn (Kentish, 2017) and focusing on strengths of Prime Minister Theresa May, Labour focused more ongaining supporters by uplifting their campaign on both Twitter and Facebook(Kentish, 2017) Even though Labour party did not win the election, thesocial media did increase candidate Jeremy Corbyns online popularity among thenew age voters on Twitter (Polonski, 2017), which led to the Labours electionresult witnessing its share of vote rise by 9.6 points to 40 %, considered tobe the highest increase in a single election since 1945 (GetSet cited The Guardian, 2017) Twitter as a news source and sharing of junk newsDuring the 2016 US presidential elections, the presence and sharing of fake news and targeted advertising on social media platforms were largely debated. Though there were distribution of strongly opiniated content with a political twist, but fake news was unable to make its way on Facebook and affect the outcome of elections (Littunen, 2017).Similarly, in a study by Oxford Internet Institutehighlighted by (Littunen, 2017) it was found that still 11.4% of junk newsstories were shared as compared to 33.8% during US election. Though social media users shared five links to professionalnews and information, they even shared one link to junk news during electioncampaign (Ho struggled et al., 2017).However, in another study by Bournemouth, it was found that while 13 % tweetswere regarding junk news, 54% tweets were linked to the professional news andinformation sources and about 16.5% of traffic was generated by highlyautomated accounts about UK politics (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017)The BBC was the most popular news source being shared with22.7% of the content glide slope from this source, followed by 17.7% links directingto the Guardians website (Howard et al.,2017). A majority of various otherpolitical content shared was from public generated sources like blogs and polishedsociety organisations, whose links were more as compared to the links to junknews. However, unlike the 2016 elections where it was claimed thatthe spreading of f ake news propelled Donald Trump to office (Tait, 2017), the UK election results didnot get hold any influence of fake news circulation. An analysis by Buzzfeed (Bauchowitz and Hnska, 2017) notedthat among the 30 most frequently shared URLs, the Conservative supporters hadshared nearly to 13 story links attacking Corbyn and Labour and exclusively 2 storieswere related to Conservative policy. On the other hand, Labour supportersshared 14 stories attacking conservatives while 7 focused on Labours policy(Bauchowitz and Hnska, 2017).Meanwhile, on Facebook there were more links to negativestories about Corbyn and absence seizure of positive story links to May.Twitter Analysis Hern (2017) highlighted a study by the Oxford InternetInstitute which stated that the Labour party dominated the talk onTwitter, with almost 40% of tweets on election-related hashtags and providedthe digital strategists an analysis of Labour winning the social mediaelection (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017). On the other hand, the Twittersaw scarcely 26% tweets about Conservative party, with the SNP, UKIP and LiberalDemocrats receiving 19 per cent, 9.6 per cent and 5.7 per cent, respectively(Hern, 2017).According to Twitter data (Gallacher and Kaminska, 2017),about 88% of the Labour candidates created account as compared to 73% ofConservative candidates.With almost 63% of the online population (Polonski, 2017)using Facebook each week, of which 80% constitute the younger generation agedbetween 18 to 24, it makes Facebook the most widely used social networking sitein the UK. During the 2017 election campaigning, Facebook was the most crucialsocial media channel on which content of articles or video recordings were shared 16million times (Littunen, 2017) related to Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn. Even though the most talked about politicians in the top 20political subjects during the election on Facebook were Theresa May and theTories, it was the Labour which gained popularity and whose posts were sharedalmost a million times (Shammas, 2017). This proved how the social mediainfluenced and enhanced a serious political engagement while leading to youngvoters expressing their political opinion.But (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017) notes that Twitterhad the most crucial role to play throughout the GE 2017 campaign as theretweets do were more than the number of tweets as compared to the originaltweets being only about one-quarter of the total GE2017 discussion.The Twitter debate around GE 2017 which was dominated by thepro-Labour conversation hashtags (Cram etal., 2017) also witnessed the ongoing issue of Brexit as one of the topthree most popular hashtag. Not only the external issues but also the hashtagsintroduced by various broadcast media outlets heavily influenced the GE 2017Twitter debate (Cram et al., 2017) Brexit, which continues to be the hottest topic till date, saw an increase in the tweets and posts by the Conservatives from 20 per cent to almost a thir d while the Labour did not post any content related to it during the campaign (Express, 2017)With the Labour party focusing on social issues especiallyhealthcare as a part of the online campaigning, the posts on the partysFacebook and Twitter pages were being shared almost three times more in totalby the users (Cecil, 2017). Twitter wasthe most powerful tool used by the Labour for which the party (Booth and Hern,2017) had spent a huge amount of money just to promote its single forthemanyhashtag.Corcoran notes (2017) that Corbyns video message on the dayof the election had over 88,000 engagements and 1.6 million views whichprompted his followers to vote for him whereas Mayslengthy status updateattracted only 12,000 engagements (Corcoran, 2017) The Labour which was much more active in posting contentmore than the Conservatives and any other party successfully generated about2.5 total interactions as compared to the latter which had only 1 millioninteractions. Although 90% of shares, l ikes and comments for Labour was aresult of their video posts (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017) Even though Labour was a way ahead of the conservatives, theConservatives did saw a jump in its page for a brief period on May 27 followinga video post encouraging its followers to share it if they didnt want to electCorbyn as their PM (Corcoran, 2017). The video had about 150,000 engagementsand almost 9 million views. Despite being considered to be the highest numberof views for any other political campaign video in the British history, theyoung voters were more inspired by the positive messages by Labour than thenegative tone of the Conservatives (Reid and Ma, 2017)The GE 2017 online campaigning witnessed a tough war betweenthe two major parties with the Labour page receiving more number of shares,likes and love reactions as against Conservatives page which saw more commentson less posts besides receiving angry reactions to majority of their posts(Corcoran, 2017)Out of every five po sts on Twitter or Facebook byConservatives, four posts had mentions of either Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn,an increase from 75% to 84% (Express, 2017)Due to the elections being called early only 63 per cent ofthe 2015 candidates used Twitter during GE 2017 as compared to 76% percent ofthe candidates in GE 2015. But, thetwitter activity increased, with candidates having a Twitter account posting 86tweets in 2015 (Technology Review, 2017) to 123.5 tweets in 2017. Frequent Mentions and Postings Twitter witnessed Jeremy Corbyn as the most mentionedaccount with 1,367,392 and Theresa May at only 654,417, much more than theirrespective parties where uklabour was mentioned in 323.027 tweets andconservatives was mentioned almost 307,550 times (Cram et al., 2017) While BBCqt was the most used hashtags followed by GE2017,VoteLabour was the third most used Labour hashtags (Thorsen, Jackson andLilleker, 2017). Here, mainstream media also plaDuring the beginning of the election campaign, Corbyn h admore than twice the number of followers on both Twitter and Facebook as that ofMays accounts (Cecil, 2017) and by the end of the election Corbyn also gainedmore supporters than May. With a 45 per cent increase in the number offollowers on Twitter and Facebook pages of Corbyn over the campaign, thenumbers reached from 850,000 each to more than 1.2 million (Cecil, 2017)More than the Labours account, Corbyns personal Twitteraccount had Labour supporting engagement which led to Twitter attracting moreLabour supporters as compared to Conservative engagement driven by Maysaccount (Bauchowitz and Hnska, 2017)The generation of famous femes by laboureoin ended up beingan exceptionally potent strategy for encouraging retweets conveying asocialist message (Cram et al.,2017). While conservatives posted about 10 to 20 posts a singleday, the Labour interacted more with its supporters through social media byposting over 30 posts (GetSet, 2017) each day across all the social mediaplatforms.Thoug h the savvy use of social media platforms effectively by Corbyn and Labour helped them drive reach out to young first-time voters (Cram et al., 2017), the microtargeting advertising strategy of Conservatives was effective (Wendling, 2017) but because it did not go down well with the publics view led to their failure over social media (Wendling, 2017).It can be verbalise that instead of shaping the public opinion,the social media was simply contemplating the opinion. According to the data by YouGov (Yaxley, 2017) the Britsbelieved that the broadcast media including 42% of television, print mediaincluding 32% of newspapers and magazines had more influence on them oversocial media, which only had 26 % influence, regarding how they decided tovote. But about 50 % young voters (Yaxley, 2017) believed that itwas the social media which helped them choose whom to vote for as it was notonly primary source of political information but also helped them communicatewith the politicians directly. While television still remained the firstinfluence for the votes, social media turned out to be the second mostinfluence on votes by younger voters aged between 18-24 years old (Yaxley,2017)With the social media campaign which encouraged young votersto register their votes, the Labour party was able to add a total of 33parliamentary seats and outnumber the majority held by the Conservatives. The Labour party believed that the effective use of socialmedia helped them win the seats they lost during the GE 2015 with their messagevideos being able to reach to 30% of the UK Facebook users (Crabtree, 2017).ConclusionThe result of the GE 2017 would have been quite different ifsocial media did not play a major role and influenced the campaign, as Twitterand Facebook only helped the Labour party transform its fate and gain supportthrough its powerful messages. The GE 2017 saw a massive use of Facebook and Twitter but thepolitical leaders and parties did not make their presence felt on othe r popularsocial networking apps including Instagram and Snapchat much. Even thoughthey lack the share feature, these apps are built around close ties which wouldhave helped the parties and leaders make the content strongly effective amongpeer to peer (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017). While Snapchat was hardlyused during the election, Instagram too saw only 33,200 followers of Labour and6,555 followers of Tories (Thorsen, Jackson and Lilleker, 2017)The social media networks give the politicians and theirparties an opportunity to engage in new forms of community building and allowthe general public to enter their political arena through direct interaction(Gibson, 2015 Gibson et al. 2016). The parties are able to mobilise not onlymembers but also non-members to raise their articulate and put forward theiropinions on their behalf during elections (Bright et al., 2017 cited Karpf et al). The new resources that such toolsgenerate clearly offer a considerable boost to parties capacit y to fight andwin elections (Lilleker et al., 2017)In order to reach out to the users, the political partiesmade use of the social media as a powerful tool by sharing video messages onlybecause the broadcasting of any political advertising outside of official partyis banned from UK television (GetSet, 2017). The emergence of political attack ads (GetSet, 2017) whichwas prevalent in the 2016 presidential campaign was also seen for the first timeduring the 2017 general elections.The success of the leftist Labour party in UK during the2017 election on social media and the right republican party by Donald Trumpduring 2016 US elections has been given to savvy use of Twitter and the immediatesharing facilities of social media by the leaders and followers (Segesten andBossetta, 2017). Even the results of the election show how a well-plannedsocial media campaign with a targeted audience can prove beneficial to anypolitical party. Witnessing the huge reach of social media in the US 2016 GEan d UK GE 2017, it can be said that the social media platforms are nowproviding the politicians a new way of utilising their power. But, it is alsoto be noted that with social media becoming increasingly crowded and drippedwith fake articles and clickbait articles (Polonski, 2017) it gets difficultfor many political leaders and parties to build meaningful relationship withthe public (Polonski, 2017) The social media especially Twitter brought the volatilityand change within the political mobilisation and collective action in the GE2017 (Margetts, 2017)Twitter is obviously not demonstrative of the voters as awhole and along these lines it is not really a clear impression of themany, not the few. While Twitter cant be utilize to anticipateelections and (Cram et al.,2017)the mind-boggling support that GE 2017 saw for Labour and Jeremy Corbyn may notbe completely reflected in the polling booths, it is a helpful tool in givingus the mind-set of the individuals who are spurred enough to r emark on socialmedia platforms. References Bartlett, J. and Jones, A. K. (2015) Who won theTwitter election campaign battle?, The Telegraph, May. uncommitted athttp//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/politics-blog/11590772/Who-won-the-Twitter-campaign-battle.html.Bauchowitz, S. and Hnska, M. (2017) How theGeneral Election 2017 Campaign is Shaping Up on Twitter, LSE. available at http//blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2017/06/05/how-the-general-election-2017-campaign-is-shaping-up-on-twitter/(Accessed 1 January 2018).Booth, R. and Hern, A. (2017) Labour wonsocial media election, digital strategists say, The Gaurdian.Available athttps//www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/09/digital-strategists-give-victory-to-labour-in-social-media-election-facebook-twitter(Accessed 29 December 2017).Boyle, D. and Maidment, J. (2017) Theresa Mayannounces snap general election on June 8 to make a success of Brexit, TheTelegraph, April. Available athttp//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/1 8/breaking-theresa-may-make-statement-downing-street-1115am1/.Bright, J. et al. (2017) Does Campaigningon Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence from candidate use of Twitterduring the 2015 and 2017 UK Elections, (June), pp. 133. Available athttp//arxiv.org/abs/1710.07087.Cecil, N. (2017) How Jeremy Corbyn beatTheresa May in the social media election war, Evening Standard.Available athttps//www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/how-jeremy-corbyn-beat-theresa-may-in-the-social-media-election-war-a3564746.html(Accessed 30 December 2017).Corcoran, L. (2017) Heres how the UK electionis playing out on social media, Newswhip. Available athttp//www.newswhip.com/2017/05/heres-how-the-uk-election-is-playing-out-on-social-media/(Accessed 1 January 2018).Crabtree, J. (2017) Facebook is playing adecisive role in UK politics and regulators are starting to take note, CNBC.Available at https//www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/facebook-social-media-influence-on-elections-and-democracy.html(Accessed 4 January 20 18).Cram, L. et al. (2017) UK GeneralElection 2017 a Twitter Analysis, Neuropolitics Research Lab, 2017,pp. 111. Available at http//arxiv.org/abs/1706.02271.Express (2017) General Election 2017 Labourraces into lead over Conservatives, Sunday Express. Available athttps//www.express.co.uk/news/politics/806658/General-Election-Labour-Conservatives-social-media.Gallacher, J. and Kaminska, M. (2017) Facebookneeds to be more percipient about its effect on democracy, The Guardian,June. Available athttps//www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/12/general-election-social-media-facebook-twitter.GetSet (2017) THE IMPACT OF GETTING YOURSOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY RIGHT UK ELECTION 2017, GetSet for Growth.Available atThe impact of getting your social media strategy right UK Election 2017(Accessed 1 January 2018).Hern, A. (2017) Labour dominating electionconversation on Twitter, study finds, The Gaurdian. Available athttps//www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/31/labour-dominating-election-conve rsation-on-twitter-study-finds(Accessed 29 December 2017).Howard, P. N. et al. (2017) Social Mediaand News Sources during the 2017 UK General Election, (JUNE), pp. 17.Jensen, M. J. (2016) In the 2015 GeneralElection campaign, politicians used social media to broadcast to voters ratherthan converse with them, Democratic Audit UK. Available at http//www.democraticaudit.com/2016/02/02/social-media-and-political-campaigning-a-look-at-the-2015-uk-general-election-campaign/(Accessed 03 January 2018).Kentish, B. (2017) Tories spent more than 1mon negative Facebook adverts attacking Jeremy Corbyn, Independent,June. Available athttp//www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservative-social-media-strategy-attack-jeremy-corbyn-labouir-twitter-facebook-video-stormzy-akala-a7784406.html.Lilleker, D. G. et al. (2017) Socialmedia campaigning in Europe mapping the terrain, Journal of InformationTechnology & Politics. Routledge, 0(0), p. 19331681.2017.1397239. doi10.1080/19331681.2017.1397239.Litt unen, M. (2017) An analysis of news andadvertising in the UK general election, openDemocracyUK. Availableathttps//www.opendemocracy.net/uk/analysis-of-news-and-advertising-in-uk-general-election(Accessed 02 January 2018).Margetts, H. (2017) Why Social Media May HaveWon the 2017 General Election, Political Quarterly, 88(3), pp. 386390.doi 10.1111/1467-923X.12408.MarketMakers (2017) The UKs most socialelection yet?, MarketMakers. Available at http//www.marketmakers.co.uk/the-uks-most-social-election-yet/(Accessed 02 January 2018).Polonski, V. (2017) From voices to votes howyoung people used social media to influence the General Election, ElectionAnalysis. Available at http//www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2017/section-5-the-digital-campaign/from-voices-to-votes-how-young-people-used-social-media-to-influence-the-general-election/(Accessed 02 January 2018).Reid, A. and Ma, A. (2017) Conservatives did notonce use social media to encourage voter registration, study finds, In dependent,May. Available athttp//www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservatives-voter-registration-social-media-not-use-encourage-facebook-twitter-election-2017-a7756736.html.Reuters (2015) Social media and the 2015general election, Reuters Institute. Available athttps//reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/risj-review/social-media-and-2015-general-election(Accessed 03 January 2018).Segesten, A. D. and Bossetta, M. (2017) Atypology of political fraternity online how citizens used Twitter tomobilize during the 2015 British general elections, InformationCommunication and Society. Taylor & Francis, 20(11), pp. 16251643.doi 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413.Shammas, J. (2017) Facebook may have lost TheresaMay her majority as young general election voters flooded social media withpro-Labour posts, The Sun, June. Available athttps//www.thesun.co.uk/news/3767326/facebook-theresa-may-majority-general-election-voters-pro-labour-posts/.Technology Review (2017) How Tweets Translateinto Votes, MIT Technology Review. Available athttps//www.technologyreview.com/s/609229/how-tweets-translate-into-votes/(Accessed 02 January 2018).Thorsen, E., Jackson, D. and Lilleker, D. (2017) UKElection Analysis 2017 Media, Voters and the Campaign Early reflections fromleading academics. Bournemouth Centre for the Study of Journalism, Cultureand Community.Wendling, M. (2017) Election 2017 Was itFacebook wot swung it?, BBC. Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-40209711(Accessed 02 January 2018).Yaxley, D. (2017) Brits believe traditionalmedia mattered more in the 2017 general election, YouGov UK.Available athttps//yougov.co.uk/news/2017/08/04/brits-believe-traditional-media-mattered-more-2017/(Accessed 01 January 2018).